3. Structuring Research and Analysis for Strategic Decision-Making

This section covers structuring research to support strategic decision-making at the board level. We'll explore identifying long-term trends (macro trends) versus short-term hype and analyzing competitive advantages, allowing for well-informed decisions that guide product and market strategies effectively.

A foundational element in strategic research is distinguishing trends with longevity from fleeting hype. Not every innovative or market-adopted product is likely to succeed long-term. Making this distinction prevents hasty decisions and helps leaders focus on genuinely impactful moves.

Case Study: Among Us – A Hype-Driven Success

Consider the game Among Us, which gained sudden global popularity during the pandemic, even though it had existed for two years prior. In its peak month, it saw an extraordinary 68 million mobile downloads. However, this popularity was largely fueled by social isolation and the appeal of connecting with friends remotely, making it more of an anomaly than a new industry trend. Today, Among Us has a smaller, more stable user base, illustrating how temporary circumstances created a hype rather than a sustainable trend.

Lessons Learned from Among Us:

Another Example: Electric Scooters

The electric scooter business also surged, with brands like Lime initially expanding aggressively into markets worldwide. Despite demand for urban mobility solutions, the electric scooter market faced significant profitability challenges due to:

These examples highlight the importance of analyzing market trends within regulatory, operational, and societal contexts before committing resources.

Key Reflection Points

To better assess whether a product or service represents a genuine trend or a hype-driven anomaly, consider these questions:

User Acquisition Strategy: Understanding Competitive Edge

A common misstep in evaluating market opportunities is underestimating the unfair advantage established players have, particularly in user acquisition.

Case Study: Hyper-Casual Games

Hyper-casual game publishers benefit from vast user bases and low-cost, performance-driven marketing tactics. Companies with extensive gaming portfolios can afford to cross-promote users across games, keeping acquisition costs low. For example:

Case Study: Portfolio-Based User Acquisition

Another example involves larger game publishers with diverse portfolios aiming for long-term user acquisition efficiency across multiple titles rather than focusing on individual games. This strategy allows companies to prioritize category dominance over short-term profitability by absorbing high acquisition costs initially and targeting lifetime user engagement across their games.

Understanding such models is essential; attempting to compete without the resources to match these user acquisition strategies can lead to unsustainable business costs.

Case Study: Itaú’s Bike-Sharing Model

Itaú’s bike-sharing service across São Paulo illustrates another form of competitive strategy, prioritizing brand awareness over immediate profitability. As São Paulo restricts traditional advertising, these bikes double as mobile advertisements. For Itaú, the primary goal is brand presence, not short-term profitability. This insight is critical in evaluating the viability of similar models without understanding the primary objectives of the companies involved.

Mistakes to Avoid in User Acquisition Analysis

To assess if a product is driven by hype or sustainable trends, avoid these common errors:

Utilizing Research Frameworks for Robust Analysis

To ensure a sound foundation for decision-making, leverage frameworks like the Business Case, Lean Canvas, and Market Matrix. Each provides a structured approach to assessing market opportunities and trends from different angles, helping teams cross-reference insights and validate the feasibility of new ventures.

  1. Business Case: Essential for understanding financial and operational feasibility, including cash flow projections and payback periods.
  2. Lean Canvas: Useful for mapping out potential projects, aligning team goals, and evaluating risks and opportunities.
  3. Market Matrix: Aids in assessing market consolidation, competition, and innovation, offering a comprehensive view of industry positioning.

Conclusion

Accurate market analysis involves assessing a blend of trend sustainability, competitive advantages, and strategic positioning. By recognizing genuine trends and utilizing advanced research frameworks, Product Leaders can make strategic decisions that align with both short-term goals and long-term company vision.